🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.